- DI & DS
- English Language
-
Intelligence & CR
- Alphabet & Number Ranking
- Analytical Reasoning
- Blood Relations Test
- Coding - Decoding
- Comparision of Ranks
- Direction Sense Test
- Mathematical Operation / Number Puzzles
- Series
- Sitting Arrangement
- Statement and Arguement
- Statement and Conclusion
- Statement and Course of Action
- Statement-Assumption
- Syllogism
-
Mathematical Skills
- Average
- Calender
- Clocks
- Geometry
- Height and Distance
- Logarithms
- Mensuration
- Mixtures and Alligations
- Number System
- Percentage
- Permutation and Computation
- Probability
- Profit and Loss
- Ratio and Proportion
- Set Theory
- Simple calculations
- Simple Equations
- Simple Interest and Compound Interest
- Time and Work
- Time, Speed and Distance
-
25.
Five people joined different engineering colleges. Their first names were Sarah (Ms.), Swati (Ms.), Jackie, Mohan and Priya (Ms.). The surnames were Reddy, Gupta, Sanyal, Kumar and Chatterjee. Except for one college which was rated as 3 star, all other colleges were rated either 4 star or 5 star.
The “Techno Institute” had a higher rating than the college where Priya studied. The three-star college was not “Deccan College.” Mohan‟s last name was Gupta but he didn't study at “Barla College.” Sarah, whose last name wasn‟t Sanyal, joined “Techno Institute.” Ms. Kumar and Jackie both studied at four-star colleges. Ms. Reddy studied at the “Anipal Institute,” which wasn‟t a five-star college. The “Barla College” was a five-star college. Swati‟s last name wasn't Chatterjee. The “Chemical College” was rated with one star less than the college where Sanyal studied. Only one college was rated five star.[1] Which is the correct combination of first names and surnames?
A. Mohan Gupta, Sarah Kumar, Priya Chatterjee
B. Priya Chatterjee, Sarah Sanyal, Jackie Kumar
C. Jackie Sanyal, Swati Reddy, Mohan Gupta
D. Mohan Gupta, Jackie Sanyal, Sarah Reddy
E. Jackie Chatterjee, Priya Reddy, Swati Sanyal[2] Which option gives a possible student - institute combination?
A. Priya – Anipal, Swati – Deccan, Mohan – Chemical
B. Swati – Barla, Priya – Anipal, Jackie – Deccan
C. Joydeep – Chemical, Priya – Techno, Mohan – Barla
D. Priya – Anipal, Joydeep – Techno, Sarah – Barla
E. Swati – Deccan, Priya – Anipal, Sarah – Techno[3] Mohan Gupta may have joined:
A. Techno – Institute which had 5 star rating
B. Deccan College which had 5 star rating
C. Anipal Institute which had 4 star rating
D. Chemical College which had 4 star rating
E. Techno – Institute which had 4 star rating[4] In which college did Priya study?
A. Anipal Institute
B. Chemical Institute
C. Barla College
D. Deccan College
E. Techno- Institute[5] The person with surname Sanyal was:
A. Sarah studying in Chemical College
B. Swati studying in Barla College
C. Priya studying in Deccan College
D. Jackie studying in Deccan College
E. Sarah studying in Techno- Instituteasked in XAT
View Comments [0 Reply]
-
26.
The regular mathematics faculty could not teach because of being sick. As a stop gap arrangement, different visiting faculty taught different topics on 4 different days in a week. The scheduled time for class was 7:00 am with maximum permissible delay of 20 minutes. The monsoon made the city bus schedules erratic and therefore the classes started on different times on different days.
Mr. Singh didn't teach on Thursday. Calculus was taught in the class that started at 7:20 am. Mr. Chatterjee took the class on Wednesday, but he didn't teach probability. The class on Monday started at 7:00 am, but Mr. Singh didn't teach it. Mr. Dutta didn't teach ratio and proportion. Mr. Banerjee, who didn't teach set theory, taught a class that started five minutes later than the class featuring the teacher who taught probability. The teacher in Friday's class taught set theory. Wednesday's class didn't start at 7:10 am. No two classes started at the same time.
[1] The class on Wednesday started at:
A. 7:05 am and topic was ratio and proportion.
B. 7:20 am and topic was calculus.
C. 7:00 am and topic was calculus.
D. 7:20 am and topic was calculus.
E. 7:05 am and topic was probability.[2] The option which gives the correct teacher- subject combination is:
A. Mr. Chatterjee – ratio and proportion
B. Mr. Banerjee – calculus
C. Mr. Chatterjee – set theory
D. Mr. Singh – calculus
E. Mr. Singh – set theory[3] Probability was taught by:
A. Mr. Dutta on Monday
B. Mr. Dutta on Thursday
C. Mr. Singh on Wednesday
D. Mr. Singh on Monday
E. None of these[4] The option which gives a possible correct class time – week day combination is:
A. Wednesday – 7:10 am, Thursday – 7:20 am, Friday – 7:05 am
B. Wednesday – 7:20 am, Thursday – 7:15 am, Friday – 7:20 am
C. Wednesday – 7:05 am, Thursday – 7:20 am, Friday – 7:10 am
D. Wednesday – 7:10 am, Thursday – 7:15 am, Friday – 7:05 am
E. Wednesday – 7:20 am, Thursday – 7:05 am, Friday – 7:10 amasked in XAT
View Comments [0 Reply]
-
27.
Four married couples competed in a singing competition. Each couple had a unique team name. Points scored by the teams were 2, 4, 6 and 8. The “Sweet Couple” won 2 points. The “Bindas Singers” won two more points than Laxman's team. Mukesh's team won four points more than Linas's team, but Lina's team didn't score the least amount of points. “Just Singing” won 6 points. Waheda wasn't on the team called “New Singers”. Sanjeev's team won 4 points. Divya wasn't on the “Bindas Singers” team. Tapas and Sania were on the same team, but it wasn't the “Sweet Couple”.
[1] Laxman's teammate and team's name were:
A. Divya and Sweet Couple
B. Divya and Just Singing
C. Waheda and Bindas Singers
D. Lina and Just Singing
E. Waheda and Sweet couple[2] The teams arranged in the ascending order of points are:
A. Bindas Singers, Just Singing, New Singers, Sweet Couple
B. Sweet Couple, New Singers, Just Singing, Bindas Singers
C. New Singers, Sweet Couple, Bindas Singers, Just Singing
D. Sweet Couple, Bindas Singers, Just Singing, New Singers
E. Just Singing, Bindas Singers, Sweet Couple, New Singers[3] The Combination which has the couples rightly paired is:
A. Mukesh, Lina
B. Mukesh, Waheda
C. Sanjeev, Divya
D. Sanjeev, Lina
E. Sanjeev, Wahedaasked in XAT
View Comments [0 Reply]
-
28.
-
29.
Mr. Rajiv Singhal, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Loha India Ltd., (a steel manufacturing company) had just been visited by several other directors of the company. The directors were upset with recent actions of the company president, Mr. Ganesh Thakur. They demanded that the board consider firing the president.
Mr. Thakur, recently appointed as president, had undertaken to solve some of the management-employees problems by dealing directly with the individuals, as often as possible. The company did not have a history of strikes or any other form of collective action and was considered to have good work culture. However, Mr. Thakur felt that by dealing directly with individuals, he could portray the management’s concern for the employees. An important initiative of Mr. Thakur was to negotiate wages of the supervisors with each supervisor. In these negotiation meetings he would not involve anyone else, including the Personnel Department which reported to him, so as to take unbiased decision. After negotiation, a wage contract would be drawn up for each supervisor. This, he felt, would recognize and reward the better performers. Mr. Thakur successfully implemented the process for most of the supervisors, except those working in night shift. For them he had drawn up the contracts unilaterally benchmarking the wages of supervisors of night shift with that of supervisors of the day shift.
For several days Ram Lal a night shift supervisor, had been trying to seek an appointment with Mr. Thakur about his wages. He was disgruntled, not only over his failure to see the president, but also over the lack of discussions about his wage contract prior to its being effected. As a family man with six dependents, he felt his weekly wage should be higher than that granted to him.
Last Thursday afternoon Ram Lal stopped by the president’s office and tried to see him. Mr. Thakur’s secretary refused his request on the grounds that Mr. Thakur was busy. Infuriated, Ram Lal stormed into the president’s office and confronted the startled Mr. Thakur, with his demands for a better wage. Mr. Thakur stood up and told Ram Lal to get out of his office and express his grievance through official channel. Ram Lal took a swing at the president who in turn punched Ram Lal on the jaw and knocked him unconscious.
[1] The most likely premise behind Mr. Thakur’s initiative regarding individualised meetings with the supervisors seems to be
(A) Involvement of company’s president in wage problems of employees will lead to a better goodwill towards the management among the workers.
(B) Employee related policies should allow scope for bargaining by employees which leads to unsatisfied employees.
(C) Individual agreements with supervisors would allow the management to prevent any possible collective action by the supervisors.
(D) Management will be able to force supervisors to accept lesser wages individually in this way.
(E) He would be able to know who the trouble makers in the plant are by interacting with the supervisors.[2] Out of the following, which one seems to be the most likely cause of Ram Lal’s grievance?
(A) His disappointment with the management’s philosophy of having one to one interaction as the supervisors were in a way being forced to accept the wage contracts.
(B) His being in the night shift had worked to his disadvantage as he could not interact with the management regarding his problem.
(C) He was not allowed to meet chairman of the board of directors of the company.
(D) Employment in the night shift forced him to stay away from his family during the day time and therefore he could not interact with his family members much.
(E) All of these.[3] The most important causal factor for this entire episode could be:
(A) Trying to follow a divide-and-rule policy in his dealings with the supervisors.
(B) Paternalistic approach towards mature individuals in the organisation.
(C) Legalistic approach to employee problems.
(D) Inconsistent dealings of Mr. Thakur with supervisors.
(E) Inadequate standards for measurement of supervisors’ on-job performance.[4] The situation with Mr. Lal could have been avoided if Mr. Thakur had
1. Delegated the task of negotiation of wage contracts for night shift employees to Personnel department.
2. Created a process for supervisors working in the night shift so that they could have an opportunity to interact with him.
3. Created an open door policy that would have allowed employees to see him without any appointment.
4. Postponed the decision of wage revision for supervisors in the night shift for two months, since supervisors were rotated on different shifts after every two months.
The option that best arranges the above managerial interventions in decreasing order of organisational impact is:
(A) 4, 2, 3, 1
(B) 4, 3, 2, 1
(C) 4, 3, 1, 2
(D) 4, 1, 2, 3
(E) 2, 3, 1, 4
[5] Apart from the supervisors working the night shift, executives of which department will have the most justified reasons to be disgruntled with Mr. Thakur’s initiative?
1. Production department – for not being consulted regarding the behaviour of the supervisors on the shop floor.
2. Finance department – for not taken into confidence regarding the financial consequences of the wage contracts.
3. Marketing department – for not being consulted on the likely impact of the wage contracts on the image of the company.
4. Quality control – for not being able to give inputs to Mr. Thakur on how to improve quality of steel making process.
5. Personnel department – for it was their work to oversee wage policies for employees and they had been ignored by Mr. Thakur.
(A) 1 + 2 + 3
(B) 1 + 4 + 5
(C) 1 + 3 + 4
(D) 1 + 2 + 5
(E) 3 + 4 + 5[6] Which of the following managerial attributes does Mr. Thakur seem to lack the most?
(A) Emotional instability under pressure
(B) Proactive problem solving
(C) Ethical behaviour
(D) Independent decision making
(E) Emotional stability under pressure
asked in XAT
View Comments [0 Reply]
-
30.