In each of the questions, six statements are given. You have to assume
the given statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance
from the commonly known facts. From the options, choose the one in which
the third statement logically follows from the first two statements. 1). All dolphins swim. 2). A crow is a bird. 3). A crow swims. 4). All birds chirp. 5). All birds eat. 6). A crow eats.
The question consists of five statements followed by options consists of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements. 1. All universities appoint experienced teachers 2. Kashi Vidyapeeth appoints experienced teachers. 3. Kashi Vidyapeeth is a university. 4. Some universities employ experienced teachers. 5. Kashi Vidyapeeth only appoints experienced teachers.
Answer: C As “132” is the only order of sentences which gives a valid argument.
Q. No. 27:
The question consists of five statements followed by options consists of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements. 1. Migration of people augments housing problem in urban areas. 2. Increase in housing problem in urban areas is determined to economic growth. 3. Migration of people is detrimental to economic growth. 4. Some migration does not cause increase in urban housing problem. 5. Some migration is not detrimental to economic growth.
Answer: D As “213” is the only order of sentences which gives a valid argument.
Q. No. 28:
Each question consists of five statements followed by options consists of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements. 1. Some drivers are drug addicted. 2. All drug addicted drivers should be terminated. 3. Driver Balbeer should be terminated. 4. Driver Balbeer is drug addicted. 5. Some drivers should be terminated.
Answer: A As “215” is the only order of sentences which gives a valid argument.
Q. No. 29:
Each question consists of five statements followed by options consists
of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option
which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a
conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements. 1. No officer is a teacher 2. Mr. Rangachary is not a teacher. 3. Mr. Rangachary is an officer. 4. Dr. Nandi is not an officer. 5. Dr. Nandi is a teacher.
Answer: D As “132” is the only order of sentences which gives a valid argument.
Q. No. 30:
If all the statements marked I, II and III are true, then which one of the following is logically deduced. Marked the options which is logically most weakly supported. I. Some rich man are Philanthropists. II. No person is a thief. III. No good person who are Philanthropists are thieves.
A :
No good people who are philanthropists are thieves.
B :
No rich people who are good is a thief.
C :
All rich people are good and philanthropists.
D :
No rich people who are thieves are philanthropists.
