Each of the questions consists of a statement, followed by two arguments
I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong'
argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Statement : Should government stop spending huge amounts of money on international sports ? Arguments : I.Yes, this money can be utilized for upliftment of the poor. II. No, sports persons will be frustrated and will not get international exposure.
Answer: D I is strong because government must take care of poor. II is also strong because spending less amount on international sports would discourage international exposure of Indian sports persons.
Q. No. 26:
Each of the questions consists of a statement, followed by two arguments
I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong'
argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Statement : Should all refugees, who make unauthorized entry into a country, be forced to go back to their homeland ? Arguments : I. Yes, they make their colonies and occupy a lot of land. II. No, they leave their homes because of hunger or some terror and on human grounds, should not be forced to go back.
Answer: D I is strong because it would create many kinds of problems in our country. II is also strong because on human grounds they should not be forced to go back.
Q. No. 27:
Each of the questions consists of a statement, followed by two arguments
I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong'
argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Statement : Should all the professional colleges in India be encouraged to run their own courses without affiliation to any university ? Arguments : I. Yes, this is the only way to create more opportunities for those who seek professional training. II. No, this will dilute the quality of professional training as all such colleges may not be equipped to conduct such courses.
Answer: A Argument I is not strong because it is not the only way. II is strong because it advocates the quality of professional training.
Q. No. 28:
Each of the questions consists of a statement, followed by two arguments
I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong'
argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Statement : Should all those who have come in contact with the patients of infectious respiratory disease be quarantines in their houses ? Arguments : I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease. II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.
Answer: B Argument I is strong because first those people should be tested who have come in contact with the patients.Then only quarantined if found positive. II is not strong because it may be one of the ways not only way.
Q. No. 29:
Each of the questions consists of a statement, followed by two arguments
I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong'
argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Statement : Should India support all the international policies of United States of America ? Arguments : I. No, many other powerful countries do not support the same. II. Yes, this is the only way to gain access to US development funds.
Answer: D I is not strong because we should think about India's prospect not other countries. II is also weak argument because many other parameters should be counted before giving not to such policies.
Q. No. 30:
Each of the questions consists of a statement, followed by two arguments
I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong'
argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Statement : Should there be a complete ban on advertising of tobacco products in all media ? Arguments : I. Yes, this is the only way to save people from suffering from cancer. II. No, this will adversely affect the sale of tobacco products.
Answer: D Ban on advertising of tobacco products may be one of the ways to save people from suffering from cancer, hence I is not strong. II is also not strong because it favours only for business of business products not the health of common people.